WYOMING FIRST LADY'S INITIATIVE TO

REDUCE CHILDHOOD DRINKING

 

 

 

NATIONAL NEWS

Join Together - Boston University School of Public Health

IIAA Daily Media Review

 

Underage Drinking Enforcement Center (UDETC)

Resource Alert

Leadership to Keep Children Alcohol Free

Weekly update

Marin Institute Alcohol News

Alcohol Policies Project

 

International Institute for Alcohol Awareness - Daily Media Review

 


For more information about the International Institute for Alcohol Awareness, and the national problem of underage drinking, please visit its new website by clicking the interactive logo above.


 

Underage Drinking Laws Enforcement Training Center - November 2006 Resource Alert

 

State Spotlight: The Oregon Partnership
The Oregon Partnership was essential in a recent grassroots campaign to have a nationwide department store remove T-shirts sold in its "Back to School" section. The T-shirts were emblazoned with logos normalizing the use of alcohol. The CEO of the department store contacted the Oregon Partnership via letter stating that the T-shirts would be removed and were clearly not appropriate for the intended customers, who would most likely be under the legal drinking age. For more information, go to the news article.

 

New Research on Alcohol Use & the Developing Brain
Padget, A., Bell, M. L., Shamblen, S. R., & Ringwalt, C. L. (2006). "Does learning about the effects of alcohol on the developing brain affect children's alcohol use?" Prevention Science, 7(3), 293-302.

Protecting You/Protecting Me (PY/PM) is a classroom-based, alcohol-use prevention and vehicle safety program for students in grades 1-5 developed by Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD). PY/PM is one of the first alcohol prevention programs targeting children, which incorporates emerging research on the adverse effects of alcohol on the developing brain. Results indicate that, relative to comparison students from matched schools, PY/PM students increased their knowledge of the effects of alcohol on the developing brain, their perception of the potential harm of alcohol use, and their vehicle safety skills. They also exhibited increased negative attitudes toward underage drinking, strengthened their intentions not to use alcohol, and reported decreased riding with impaired drivers. Teaching children about the effects of alcohol on the developing brain appears to be a promising strategy for underage alcohol use prevention.

 

Publications
Hardcopies of some of our publications are available at no charge. See the "Publications" page on the left.
Success Story: Montana’s Multi-jurisdictional Approach Reveals Increase in Compliance Checks
In July 2005, using funds awarded from the MT Board of Crime Control, the Flathead County Sheriff’s Office established a multi-jurisdictional Alcohol Enforcement Team (AET). The AET selected officers from various agencies to participate in specific strategies that target alcohol accessibility and availability to persons younger than 21. Throughout the year, the team has been aggressive in conducting more than 200 Compliance Checks. Since its implementation, the overall compliance rate improved from 40 to 70%. This month’s Success story shares the accomplishments of the AET and the effective results from the community’s involvement.

Click on the Resource Alert Link below to see the full text of this Success Story.
Success Story: Rhode Island’s Social Host Law Follows the Lead of Neighbor States
Rhode Island joins more than 20 States with Social Host laws. Any adult in RI "who knowingly permits persons under 21 to consume alcohol in his/her home faces escalating penalties with repeat offenses." The law closes a loophole that officials said had made it virtually impossible to bring charges against adults who knowingly permit underage drinking. This month’s Success story shares the positive results of persistence in the attainment of a successful goal.

Click on the Resource Alert Link below to see the full text of this Success Story.
November National Electronic Seminar
Governors’ Spouses Address Underage Drinking
Date: Thursday, November 16
Time: 3:00-4:15 p.m. eastern
Speakers: Mary Easley, First Lady of North Carolina, and Hope Taft, First Lady of Ohio

The Leadership to Keep Children Alcohol Free, a unique coalition of Governor's spouses, Federal Agencies and public and private organizations, is an initiative to prevent the use of alcohol by children ages 9 to 15. It is the only national effort that focuses on alcohol use in this age group. Presenters for this call will discuss the work of the initiative and how people can get involved.

Click on the National Electronic Seminars button on the left to register for this month's audio conference and see a calendar of the rest of the year's National Electronic Seminars.
If you would like to receive this Resource Alert cover page by email each month
Send us an email udetc@udetc.org.

To print a hard-copy of this month’s Resource Alert visit: ResourceAlert1106.pdf

December 7, 2006 

December Is National Drunk and Drugged Driving (“3D”) Prevention Month 

Multiple resources to help you plan and promote your 3D Month activities are available from the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) through its 3D Month Holiday Planner. In addition, Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) is conducting its annual “Tie One On for Safety” campaign during the season (see story below). To read the President’s proclamation, see a news release from the White House. 

STOP ACT PASSES BOTH HOUSES OF CONGRESS

 The bill for the Sober Truth on Preventing Underage Drinking Act (STOP Underage Drinking Act) (HR 864) passed the U.S. Senate last night and the U.S. House of Representatives this morning. The Center for Science in the Public Interest press release states “Passage of the STOP Act represents a long-overdue acknowledgement of the need to do more as a nation to address the harm caused by underage drinking.” The STOP Act is more modest in scope than some of its supporters would have liked, however, it provides an additional $18 million per year for essential prevention purposes, including the seeds of a national media campaign to reduce underage drinking

MAINE FIRST LADY AND ATTORNEY GENERAL ATTEND FORUM

 The Lincoln County News reports that Maine’s First Lady Karen Baldacci and Attorney General Steven Rowe attended a forum last week with Lincoln county residents to discuss the growing underage drinking problem in the county and the State. The aim of the forum was to inspire a community-wide effort to work on the problem.Participants learned that 15 percent of county students in grades 6-8 use alcohol compared with 12.9 percent statewide. Mrs. Baldacci and Mr. Rowe said the solution must be a community effort to be successful, and must include parents. They appealed to the participants on a personal level as parents. Mrs. Baldacci said “It’s not enough to tell them we don’t want them to drink. Make it (alcohol) difficult to access in the home. Get involved with other parents. Pay attention to where your child is and make them stick to the rules.” Mr. Rowe discussed the media messages that target underage youths and portray drinking as glamorous, noting that girls prefer flavored malt beverages, and boys beer. A followup meeting is planned in January.

OHIO FIRST LADY TESTIFIES ON BEHALF OF UPPL REPEAL

 This week, a bill was introduced in the Ohio Senate to repeal the State’s Uniform Accident Policy Provisional Law (UPPL). First Lady Hope Taft provided testimony in favor of the bill (SB #395), saying that the law, enacted in 1953, does not reflect current knowledge about either addiction or the effectiveness of alcohol interventions. She stated “In 2006, we know a lot more about addictions and ‘what works.’ We know it is a disease like diabetes or hypertension. We know treatment is effective, we know that brief interventions work in reducing use and negative consequences. We know the UPPL laws are counterproductive.” The UPPL allows health insurance companies to deny claims involving alcohol or narcotics use, whereas at the same time the companies must approve claims for similar situations such as trauma caused by not wearing a helmet, not using seatbelts, obesity, or smoking. Ms. Taft then discussed the benefits of brief alcohol interventions, including cost savings and effectiveness in reducing subsequent alcohol use. She reviewed the consequences of UPPL laws—to discourage trauma centers from asking key questions about a patient’s alcohol or drug use and providing brief interventions, because insurance companies will deny payment for services. Furthermore, under this system, impaired drivers escape from responsibility for their actions. She said a brief intervention helps people recognize the link between their substance abuse and the injuries that brought them to the emergency room. She concluded, “I urge you to vote for SB #395 to reduce stigma, save money, turn lives around, delete redundancy, and eliminate the “safe haven” for impaired drivers. Ohio needs to join other states in repealing their expensive, outdated, obsolete, counterproductive, and discriminatory UPPL laws. It’s a win-win for everyone—trauma centers, insurance companies, taxpayers, and the injured.”

PEDIATRICIANS CRITICIZE ADVERTISING EFFECTS ON CHILDREN

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) issued a new policy statement this week in response to the pervasive, inappropriate advertising aimed at children, according to a CNN report. The statement says alcohol, cigarette, and junk food ads may contribute significantly to childhood and adolescent alcohol and cigarette use, obesity, and poor nutrition. The statement cites television, internet, and magazine advertising, and even ads placed within schools. The academy calls on doctors to ask Congress and Federal agencies to restrict alcohol ads to showing only the product, not cartoon characters or attractive young women; ban junk food ads during shows geared to young children; limit commercial advertising to no more than 6 minutes per hour, a decrease of 50 percent; and prohibit interactive advertising to children on digital TV. The academy notes that several Western countries, including Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Belgium, and Greece, limit ads directed at children. The policy statement concludes that educating children and teenagers about the effects of advertising could help mitigate the harmful influence of alcohol, cigarette, and food ads. Dr. Victor Strasburger, lead author and an adolescent medicine specialist at the University of New Mexico, said in the CNN report, “What kind of society exploits its children and teenagers for money? This is an example of where public health really has to trump capitalism.” The policy statement appears in the December Pediatrics (Vol. 118, pp. 2563-2569). 

MARINE CORPS SURVEY SHOWS LINK BETWEEN EARLY USE AND RISKY DRINKING

Young men age 18 to 20 are significantly more likely to be risky drinkers if they start drinking alcohol at a young age, according to results of a large survey of Marine Corps recruits. A press release states that other risk factors for drinking problems include growing up in a household with alcohol abuse, tobacco use, and having a small or rural hometown. The researchers studied the association between childhood experiences and risky underage drinking in 41,482 male Marine recruits ages 18 to 20. All the men completed the Recruit Assessment Program questionnaire between June 2002 and April 2006, providing demographic and other personal information and answering questions designed to detect risky drinking. A total of 14.8 percent of the recruits were identified as risky drinkers, 45.1 percent as non-risky drinkers, and 40.2 percent as nondrinkers. Among drinkers, those who began drinking at age 13 or younger were 5.5 times as likely to be identified as risky drinkers. Risky drinkers were more likely than either non-risky drinkers or non-drinkers to be smokers, be from a rural or small hometown, to have experienced childhood sexual or emotional abuse, and to have a household member who had a drinking problem or mental illness. Lead author Sylvia Young of the Naval Health Research Center in San Diego and colleagues conducted the study, which appears in the December Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine (Vol. 160, pp. 1207-1214).

NASPA STRATEGIES CONFERENCE IS FEBRUARY 1-3, 2007

The National Association of Student Personnel Administrators (NASPA) is convening a conference on alcohol abuse prevention on February 1-3, 2007. The conference will bring together senior campus administrators, prevention and education staff, and researchers from the alcohol and other drug field to focus on sharing information and advancing knowledge about alcohol and other drug use at colleges and universities. Invited speakers include Ralph Hingson of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA),William DeJong of the Higher Education Center for Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse and Violence Prevention, an NIAAA panel of Rapid Response Grantees, Robert Carothers, President of the University of Rhode Island, and Larry Mazzeno, President Emeritus of Alvernia College. Noted prevention researchers and specialists will lead the conference workshops. For more information and to register online, visit the NASPA conference Web page.

CADCA LEADERSHIP FORUM IS FEBRUARY 12-17, 2007

The Community Anti-Drug Coalitions of America (CADCA) will hold its National Leadership Forum XVII on February 12 through 17, 2007, in Washington, DC. The Forum, with the theme “Coalitions: The Road to Results,” is a training conference for community coalition activists and substance abuse professionals, and features more than 75 workshops. The registration deadline is January 26. Registering by December 11 enters the registrant in a drawing to win a digital camera or other prizes such as CADCA logo gear. Registrations received by December 29 are discounted. To register, go to the CADCA Web site.

HALF OF OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA, TEENS START DRINKING BY AGE 13  

In Oakland, a 2006 report titled “Oakland on the Rocks” states that 21.2 percent of Oakland high school students had their first drink by age 11, and 50.7 percent by age 13. The November 28 San Francisco Chronicle says the report is based on a survey conducted by the Alameda County Public Health Department and the organization Environmental Prevention in Communities. The study also found that more youths are using alcohol to self-medicate stress, because it feels good, or because of peer pressure. In addition, 41 percent of youths have ridden in a car with a drunk driver. City Councilwoman Nancy Nadel has asked that the City Council’s Public Safety Committee forward recommendations from the report to the full Council. She called for better enforcement against merchants who sell alcohol to minors as well as increased efforts to urge adults to keep children from drinking. She hopes the Council will support the launch of an awareness campaign directed at adults, as well as direct funds to programs that highlight the dangers of drug and alcohol use. She stated, “We have to help young people realize the wear and tear alcohol has on their bodies.”

PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA, DRAFTS SOCIAL HOST ORDINANCE

The Palo Alto Daily News says the city is drafting a social host ordinance making it a misdemeanor to serve alcohol at gatherings where a certain number of minors are present. The city is responding to a series of incidents over the past several years in which intoxicated teens were found drinking under parental supervision. The Palo Alto police department recently hosted a forum for parents, at which panelists representing the legal, health, and education fields expressed their concerns that parents trying to teach moderate drinking may not be aware of the dangers alcohol poses to teens. Dr. David Gregg, a trauma surgeon at Stanford Hospital, said “Biologically, brains aren’t ready for alcohol until probably age 24. Laws reflect biological reality.”

MADISON, CONNECTICUT, SURVEY RESULTS TO SPUR PREVENTION PROGRAMS

An anonymous survey of Madison’s 7th- to 12th-graders reveals that in the previous month, 30 percent of the students used alcohol, 18 percent had been drunk, and 11 percent had used marijuana. As reported in the New Haven Register, 17 percent of the students who use alcohol do so at home with their parents’ knowledge. In contrast, of those students reporting drug use, only 1 percent do so at home with their parents’ knowledge. The survey was developed by the Rocky Mountain Behavioral Science Institute, which concluded from the data that about one out of five Madison public school students in grades 7 to 12 are “moderately” or “highly” alcohol or other drug involved. The data will be used as a baseline in planning local prevention programs, and an interagency steering committee will develop a preliminary action plan by the end of June.

IDAHO PROGRAM TRAINS BARTENDERS

Boise police are conducting a pilot program to decrease both underage drinking and excess service of alcohol at local bars, clubs, and restaurants. The program aims to develop effective training for servers, bartenders, and doormen. The first training class was held last week at a comedy club in downtown Boise. Local comedians certified as trainers helped facilitate the free class. Funding for the program was provided by the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. The Idaho Department of Juvenile Corrections and several other local businesses and organizations sponsored the first class. For more information, see a KTRV-TV news report.

NEBRASKA COUNTIES ARGUE FOR NEW ALCOPOP CLASSIFICATION

County commissioners across Nebraska are signing a resolution to reclassify flavored alcohol beverages (alcopops) as distilled spirits, according to an article in the McCook Daily Gazette. Currently, the Nebraska Liquor Control Commission designates alcopops as beer. The beer designation allows the alcohol industry to receive tax breaks. Starting in 2004, the liquor commission classified alcopops as distilled spirits, but reclassified them as beer in July 2006. The resolution supports the “Project Extra Mile: Underage Drinking Prevention Project” originated by Douglas County Commissioner Mary Ann Borgeson. Commissioner Borgeson expresses concern in the article that classifying alcopops as beer allows the alcohol industry to reach more young people through television advertising. In addition, the beer classification increases alcopops’ availability to young people because beer products can be sold at 1,535 off-premise locations in the State whereas spirits can be sold at 718 off-premise locations.

NEW JERSEY TOWN CONSIDERS DRINKING PARTY ORDINANCE 

The West Milford Messenger reports that the town is considering an ordinance that would allow better control of underage drinking parties. The ordinance would give police the right to enter private property and arrest minors in possession of, or consuming, alcohol. If convicted, a youth would receive a $250 fine for a first offense and $350 for a subsequent offense. In addition, the judge can suspend the youth’s driver’s license or postpone driving privileges for 6 months. The law, however, does not allow police to intervene if the minor is consuming alcohol in the presence of and with the permission of a parent, guardian, or relative of legal drinking age. The council is expected to pass the ordinance at its next meeting.

NORTH CAROLINA IMPROVES COMPLIANCE RATE

According to the Asheville Citizen Times, the North Carolina Division of Alcohol Law Enforcement reports that the State’s alcohol compliance rates have steadily improved over the past several years. The latest report is that this year’s spot checks were successful a little more than 1.5 times out of 10 in buying alcohol, a compliance rate of 16.5 percent. During 2003-04, undercover teens were successful 28.3 percent of the time and in 2004-05, 27.6 percent of the time. The Federal government requires a 20 percent compliance rate. Police attribute the improvement to aggressive training and enforcement efforts. Clerks who sell alcohol to minors face a misdemeanor charge and, if convicted, they may not work in a place that sells alcohol for 2 years. In many cases, the clerk is fired. Retailers are cited and face a fine. The State has been using the Training, Regulation, Education and Enforcement (TREE) method to enforce compliance. One program is called Be A Responsible Seller (BARS) and is offered to owners and employees of stores with liquor licenses. BARS teaches how to spot underage and intoxicated people, how to properly check IDs, and how to tactfully refuse sales and service to people who are drunk.

Note: The links to news articles provided in the Weekly Update are accessible and free of charge on the Update’s publication date.

The links may expire, and retrieval from an archive may require a fee. Past Weekly Updates can be accessed at: http://www.alcoholfreechildren.org/.


Marin Institute News January 2008
 

New Alcohol Tax Could Ease California's Budget Deficit by 20 Percent

Marin Institute recommends that Governor Schwarzenegger and state legislators raise taxes on wine, beer and distilled spirits to help reduce the state's $14 billion budget shortfall.

"A simple 25 cents per drink increase would generate almost $3 billion in revenue," said Bruce Livingston, MPP, executive director of Marin Institute. "Raising the alcohol tax for the first time in 16 years is a common sense and fiscally responsible option to help close the budget gap." Read more...

Big Alcohol Gets what it Pays for in California

From the Wine Institute to Anheuser-Busch, alcohol corporations and trade associations donated more than $3.5 million to California politicians in 2006, making the sector one of the most prolific political spenders. Couple that with roughly $3 million in lobbying efforts that same year spent directly on influencing policy and it's easy to see why the alcohol industry usually gets its way.

Marin Institute’s latest report, You Get What You Pay For, takes a close look at California’s alcohol lobby. The report highlights the top contributors to key California decision-makers, and describes gifts such as meals and basketball tickets -- that were donated by corporate lobbyists. If you live in California, look up your own representative here.

View the report

Watch the video

 Courting Gen Y: From their Screens, to their Wallets

According to a recent report from the Center on Alcohol Marketing to Youth (CAMY) , the number of alcohol ads that young people see on TV and in print has declined since 2001. This may sound like good news, but in fact ad dollars are simply shifting to new media. Indeed, when it came to harnessing the web and other new media to reach Generation Y, 2007 was a big year for the nation’s largest alcohol corporations. Read more...

Subsidizing Big Alcohol

While we know that raising alcohol taxes is one of the most effective policies available to reduce alcohol harm, industry has been a master at manipulating the media against the idea. Thankfully the New York Times economics and business columnist David Leonhardt was persuaded to think critically about the issue after a discussion with Philip Cook, economics professor at Duke University and author of "Paying the Tab: The Costs and Benefits of Alcohol Control." Leonhardt writes:

 

Since the early 1990s, the federal tax on wine -- $1.07 a gallon -- hasn't budged. The taxes on beer and liquor haven't changed either, which means that, in inflation-adjusted terms, alcohol taxes have been steadily falling. Each of the three taxes is now effectively 33 percent lower than it was in 1992. Since 1970, the federal beer tax has plummeted 63 percent. Many states taxes have also been falling. Read more...

 

Minnesota College Ousts Alcohol Ads

After two alcohol-fueled deaths in a single semester, Minnesota State University has decided to ban alcohol ads at athletic events. The new policy will remove liquor and beer advertising from coupon books, game programs and sport-related materials. Restaurant ads are also no longer allowed to promote drink specials.

All this, says the college president, because "we want to reduce the 'culture of drinking' among young people in the community." Well said.
 

Source:

Alcohol Advertising to End at MSU Athletic Events

Coming to San Diego for Alcohol Policy 14? Visit with Marin Institute Staff

If you plan on attending the Alcohol Policy 14 conference coming up at the end of this month, be sure to say hello to Marin Institute staff. We will be giving the following presentations:
 

* Bruce Livingston, executive director: plenary session: "Leveling the playing field: Countering industry control over policy." 

* Michele Simon, research and policy director: two poster sessions, one on alcoholic energy drinks and the other on transit advertising.

* Simon Rosen, research analyst, two workshops, one on alcopops taxes and the other on calculating the costs of alcohol problems in California.

* Michael Scippa, our advocacy director will also be on hand. We look forward to seeing you in San Diego!


FACT SHEET:
BEER CONSUMPTION & TAXES

Beer Consumption in the United States: Adolescents & General Population

Adolescents

  • Between 2000 and 2001, more than 62 percent of 12th grade students reported using beer on an annual basis. During the same time period, more than 40 percent of 12th grade students reported using beer monthly.1

  • Nearly 25 percent of 12th grade students reported getting "very high" or "bombed" when using beer.1

  • Nearly 38 percent of junior high school students, and nearly 73 percent of senior high school students, reported that beer is "fairly easy" or "very easy" to get.1

General Population

  • Beer accounts for 67 percent of the alcohol consumption reported in the United States.2

  • Beer consumed by the highest 10 percentile of drinkers by volume represents 42 percent of the reported alcohol consumed in the United States.2

  • Beer accounts for over four fifths (81 percent) of all the alcohol that is reported drunk in hazardous amounts in the United States.2

  • In the United States, beer is disproportionately consumed in hazardous amounts (i.e., five or more drinks per occasion) relative to wine and spirits.2

Public Opinion, Public Costs

  • Nearly 82 percent of adults favor an increase of five cents per drink in the tax on beer, wine, or liquor to pay for programs to prevent minors from drinking and to increase alcohol treatment programs.3

  • Alcohol excise tax rates have rarely been increased to compensate for the effects of inflation. As a result, "real" tax rates have declined over most of the postwar period. This erosion of real tax rates has contributed to overall declines in real beverage prices over time.4

  • In 1998, the estimated economic cost of alcohol abuse in the United States exceeded $184 billion. This cost is equivalent to roughly $683 for every man, woman and child living in the United States.4

  • The cost to Americans of underage drinking totals nearly $53 billion, equivalent to $200 for every man, women and child in the United States.5

  • Each year, the federal government spends between $900 million and $1 billion on alcohol prevention services for people of all ages, less than 2 percent of the annual cost of alcohol use by youth alone.5

  • According to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, federal excise tax collections for alcoholic beverages totaled more than $8 billion in 2000. Put into perspective, this amounts to just over 4 percent of the $184 billion in alcohol-related costs experienced by the American public.

Alcohol-Related Public Health Issues

  • On January 1, 1991, the federal excise tax on beer increased for the first time since 1951. Research shows that the rate of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) fell sharply from its 1988-90 levels in 1991 and 1992. Nationwide, gonorrhea rates declined nearly 30 percent between 1990 and 1992. Syphilis rates fell nearly 40 percent during the same time period.6

  • According to researchers at the Centers for Disease Control, a beer tax increase of 20 cents per six-pack would reduce gonorrhea rates by 8.9 percent and syphilis rates by 32.7 percent.6

  • The estimated annual cost of alcohol-related STDs in the United States is $556 million.6

  • Increases in the state excise tax on beer decrease the probability of overall violence toward children. Specifically, a 10 percent increase in the excise tax on beer will reduce the probability of severe violence by 2.3 percent, the probability of overall violence by 1.2 percent, and unconditional overall violence (the sum of participation and frequency) by about 2.1 percent.7

  • Higher beer taxes are associated with lower rates of traffic fatalities. For every 1 percent increase in the price of beer, the traffic fatality rate declines by 0.9 percent.8

  • Increasing the Federal excise tax on beer in 1988 to the inflation-adjusted equivalent of its value in 1975 would have saved between 3,330 and 3,700 lives annually.8

  • A 10 percent increase in the price of alcoholic beverages would decrease the number of binge-drinking episodes per month by approximately 8 percent.9

References
1. Parent’s Resource Institute for Drug Education (PRIDE). (2001). Pride questionnaire report. 2000-01 national summary: Grades 6 through 12. Bowling Green, KY: author.
2. Rogers, J. D., & Greenfield, T. K. (1999). Beer drinking accounts for most hazardous alcohol consumption reported in the United States. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 60(6).
3. Harwood, E. M., Wagenaar, A. C., & Zander, K. M. (1998). Youth access to alcohol survey: Summary report. Princeton, NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. (
http://www.rwjf.org/app/rw_publications_and_links/publicationsPdfs/Youth_Access_to_Alcohol_Survey.pdf).
4. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. (2000). 10th Special Report to the U.S. Congress on Alcohol and Health. Chapter 6. NIH Publication No. 00-1583. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
5. Levy, D. T., Miller, T. R., & Cox, K. C. (1999). Costs of Underage Drinking. Prepared by the Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation in support of the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Enforcing the Underage Drinking Laws Program.
6. Chesson, H., Harrison, P., & Kassler, W. J. (2000). Sex under the influence: The effect of alcohol policy on sexually transmitted disease rates in the United States. Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. XLIII, p. 215-238.
7. Markowitz, S., & Grossman, M. (1998). Alcohol regulation and domestic violence towards children. Contemporary Economic Policy, 16(3):309-320.
8. Ruhm, C. J. (1996). Alcohol policies and highway vehicle fatalities. Journal of Health Economics, 15(4):435-454.
9. Sloan, F. A., Reilly, B.A., & Schenzler, C. (1995). Effects of tort liability and insurance on heavy drinking and drinking and driving. Journal of Law and Economics, 38(1):49-77.


News Summary

Seven U.S. states are considering legislation that would lower the legal drinking age from 21 to 18 either for all residents or for members of the military, UPI reported April 3.

Lawmakers in Missouri, South Dakota, Vermont and Minnesota have introduced measures to lower the drinking age for everyone, while the military-only bills have been filed in Kentucky, Wisconsin, and South Carolina.

Some proponents argue that 18-year-olds who volunteer to fight and die for their country have proven that they are mature enough to drink. The proposals face a major hurdle in a federal law that penalizes any state that lacks an age-21 drinking law with the loss of a percentage of its federal highway funding.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Christyn on Apr 09, 2008 09:31 AM EDT
Instead of lowering the drinking age because "18 year olds are able to fight and die for this country and vote, they should be allowed to drink..." I think they should raise the military enlistment age to 21 and also make it that you are not considered a legal adult until you're 21. 18 year olds have a hard enough time trying to make decisions on college, jobs, etc. and I don't feel being 18 or 19 or 20 make you mentally capable enough to be able to decide such life altering decisions. Not to mention we need some more attentive parents out there who aren't too busy with their own lives to continue raising their children through their teen years. Too many parents take a back seat to "regain their own youth" during these crucial teen years for their children.

Posted by SDcowpoke on Apr 07, 2008 08:01 PM EDT
If we follow some of the logic in some of these posts then people actually shouldn't be drinking until age 25 to be sure the brain is fully developed! I know the brain is still developing and also believe it is possible for people to do a great deal of harm to themselves when drinking to excess, I don't believe that low risk drinking would be harmful. But, while we are at it lets seperate the issues of drinking age and drinking and driving. I don't care if you are 14 (legal in SD) or 85, if you have had anything to drink, DON'T DRIVE. I truly do not believe that just because the age is lowered means we have to have an increase in car crashes or drinking and driving problems. I do agree that part of the problem is that we don't teach young people how to drink appropriately. If we are going to seriously look at lowering the drinking age then I want to know how all the young adults are going to change the bad behavior that abounds. Are you going to start acting like adults and stop all the binge drinking and stop drinking yourselves to death? Not that older adults can't and don't do that as well.

Posted by JOHN BRICK, PHD, FAPA on Apr 07, 2008 06:23 PM EDT
Want some facts? Try these: At a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of .08%, the relative risk for a fatal crash in an 18 year old male is 3 times greater than a 21 year old male driver with the same BAC, and 34 times greater than a sober 25 year old. There are many reasons for the difference but the fact remains, younger drivers are at much higher risk for causing a fatal crash. Source: Handbook of the Medical Consequences of Alcohol and Drug Abuse, pg 12-13 (Haworth Press, 2008)

Posted by Bridget on Apr 07, 2008 05:53 PM EDT
Perhaps we should raise the age for joining the military to 21.

Posted by Kristin on Apr 07, 2008 04:48 PM EDT
While I am not positive what I feel about the drinking age- Don't tell me that suddenly 18-20 year olds will stop drinking irresponsibly just because they were "legally allowed" to drink. I know plenty of 21 year olds and older who drink or have drank irresponsibly. I can see the logic in how can you DRAFT someone into a war against their will but not let them drink, but there hasn't been a draft in over 20 years, so 18 year olds today are CHOOSING to join the miliary. And if you are not mature enough to understand that joining the military may mean you have to fight in a war, you definitely are not ready to drink alcohol. And if you argue that people will drink underage anyways, well people do illegal drugs, steal, rape, murder, etc, should all these things be legal as well? Alcohol education needs to start in jr high and it shouldn't be "alchohol is bad so don't do it", it should be this is the detrimental effects of alcohol based on scientific studies, and this is how it can impair your brain and physiological development at all ages. And then lets work to make it easier for youths and college students to find alternatives to drinking.

Posted by jmlkj@aol.com on Apr 07, 2008 04:22 PM EDT
Posted by Lauren on Apr 07, 2008 09:21 AM EDT Changing the drinking age to 18 would allow colleges and universities struggling with alcohol use to deal with the problem as a public health issue rather than a legal issue. I love this post Lauren. All alcohol and drug issues belong in the medical field, not the criminal justice field which imply locks humans away, not dealing with the problem. While the do gooders are raising the drinking age why don't they also raise the age of enlistment. Our "kids" have a better chance of being killed in Iraq than from drinking a beer. I guess that in some peoples eyes these kids are expendable. I have three college age kids. They all drink- why make them into criminals? Teach them to drink responsibly.

Posted by Mag on Apr 07, 2008 04:03 PM EDT
Teens go out and get drunk no matter what. I'm 19 and I know a lot kids do it because they are simply told not to by law. That's why they do it. I wish someone could explain to me is it okay to send my 18 year old friends to war to be killed but not let them drink? By the way teens will fulfill the expectations you have for them. If you think they're non-tiping, immature, crazy drivers, they will not tip, they will drink heavily, and cut you off. Why please someone who already thinks lowly of you? Many adults think badly of teens, so they will rebel and act out. Try thinking of teens as mature, young adults and that we'll be. We haven't been around as long as you but you'll find that we actually think, breath and believe it or not we have opinions. Sometimes adults just forget or don't want to believe that. My dog use to wander around our yard and the neighbors yard, but he wouldn't run away... However, we put up a fence just in case. He jumped over the fence and darted off. We caught him but because we thought he would run away, we put up a fence and then he did run away. People, not just teens, will be who you think they are because of how you treat them.

Posted by TomA on Apr 07, 2008 03:53 PM EDT
When I was in the Armed Forces, during the Viet Nam war,there were lots of local bars around military bases that banned servicemen in uniform because they were a cause of problems i.e. fights etc.. So much for the comments about being old enough to die, old enough to drink. Biologicaly, the impulse control and decision making ability in the human brain is in physical reconstruction in the adolescent/young adult brain rendering them nearly incapable of making wise choices in dangerous situations. Mixing toxic chemicals in the body at any age is not highly recomended and in a forming/reforming brain it isn't the brightest idea I've heard recently. Now remember the drug responsible for the most deaths world wide IS legal in many cases for people as young as 16(tobacco). So what's a few more dead kids?

Posted by Tim on Apr 07, 2008 03:27 PM EDT
A lower drinking age will mean more deaths and impairment among all age groups. History tells us that lower drinking ages mean more DWI deaths, more alcohol overdoses, more violence and more suicides. With the drinking age age at 18 that means lots more kids under 18 will have more access to alcohol too. The world will be a more dangerous place for everybody and we will spend even more time picking up the pieces. As far as the military is concerned, they have learned many lessons about alcohol and other drugs the hard way. I don't think the powers that be want to reopen that can of worms. We don't need alcohol impaired 18 year olds with their fingers on the triggers, buttons, or controls of any military equipment thank you very much. Then there is the whole issue of sexual assault and harrassment cases that have occupied the national attention in recent years... ALL ALCOHOL RELATED. Lowering the drinking age with the excuse that people need to drink to serve their country is feeble indeed. Ridiculous!

Posted by Nicolas Eyle on Apr 07, 2008 03:26 PM EDT
Expecting people to never touch a drink until they are 21 and then suddenly open the bars to them when they reach that age is like never letting someone take a driver's ed class or get a learner's permit and then suddenly handing over the car keys and say "OK your old enough now... go drive. A stupid idea. A drinking license as proposed by the University of Colorado president a few yeas ago is an excelent idea. Assume responsible use is the norm... pull the license of anyone who shows they are otherwise.

Posted by George on Apr 07, 2008 02:54 PM EDT
It is astounding that proposals to lower the age, for legal possession (consumption) of alcohol, from 21 back to 18 continue to come out. This is a bad idea with no resulting public good. The only beneficiaries of such a change would be the breweries and other alcohol producers, hospitals, automotive junk dealers and undertakers.

Posted by Mary on Apr 07, 2008 02:28 PM EDT
If you are interested in having facts at your fingertips to debunk the "Europe" myth related to youth drinking and lowering the drinking age, check out this wonderful report: http://www.ncjrs.gov/html/ojjdp/compendium/2001/9902NCPC_PIRE.pdf

Posted by Kristin Lundgren on Apr 07, 2008 02:03 PM EDT
I read an interesting proposition awhile back. The proposal was to lower the drinking age to 18 but require a license to drink. The license would be obtained after completion of a program like "driver's ed", only focused on the consequences of alcohol misuse, the danger of addiction, etc. The license could be taken away if there are infractions.

Posted by Tom on Apr 07, 2008 01:52 PM EDT
Who are any of you to say that they shouldn't lower the drinking age? People 20 years ago were drinking illegally before 21 and they are doing the same today. Lowering the drinking age encourages becoming familiar with alcohol and a mature decision maker on how much is or is not enough. Don't be a hypocrite and act like you were all perfect angels before 21.

Posted by Dan Beck on Apr 07, 2008 01:43 PM EDT
If they want to lower the drinking age, they need to raise the driving age, lower the speed limits, make cars less glamourous. Where is all the money going to fix the roads because of raising the age nationwide. Kids drink because it's made to look that if you do you can do anything. Companies are making all kinds of stuff to get young people to try their products but nothing is done to stop the advertising. You lower the drinking age, parents will be paying higher insurnace rates for their children to drive. It looks like the lobbyists for big business wants to rule again without trying to fix any problems. Money seems to talk.

Posted by Stacey on Apr 07, 2008 01:03 PM EDT
The idea that the European model works better is a myth. Check out an excellent report: The Surgeon General's Call to Action to Prevent and Reduce Underage Drinking 2007 put out by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Posted by Thomas Beckman on Apr 07, 2008 12:53 PM EDT
I for one am glad to see that legislation, on a notional level, is sticking with the drinking age of 21. Just because you join the military doesn’t mean you’re mature enough to handle Drinking. As a matter a fact the military wants it members to be more responsible and alcohol and drugs are a problem in the military. Meanwhile, there are too many lives lost on the streets and hwy’s in this country 15,000+ a year because of Drunk Drivers. Many Families are torn apart because of Alcohol it would be great to see legislation on a national level get tougher on this issue. Think of those first responders the Police, EMT’s, Firefighters that have to see the Death of these people, and to look over and see a Drunk Driver saying “what happened” staggering around in a Drunken state. It is in our Hearts to live in harmony with one another, let’s work on that. Let’s get away from the mind and it’s lost of traditional moral values.

Posted by Hermann T. Meyer on Apr 07, 2008 12:48 PM EDT
It would be profitable for the alcohol industry, the automobile business and the health sector. All others would lose, many even their life.

Posted by Ryan on Apr 07, 2008 12:42 PM EDT
I'm going to play devils advocate and argue that the allowable drinking age should be even lower than 18, while they are still under custody and influence of parents/guardians, but that the age allowing kids to drive should be increased. The European model seems to work much better than our own. Require education about drinking, let young adults experiment and learn how to drink BEFORE they get behind the wheel of a car, and require MUCH more extensive training on driving, including risks of driving under the influence, before obtaining a license.

Posted by Mia Russell on Apr 07, 2008 11:48 AM EDT
How can we lower a drinking age that has been set for the number for a developmental reason? We are saying that our military is "mature" enough to handle it, well what are we going to say when they get out of the military and then they are alcoholics in a recovery center and they say it is because they were "allowed" to drink in the military? What then? We already have a problem in that sense. And 90% or more of BUMS are claiming to bet military Vets. What is wrong with this picture??

Posted by Frank Winkler on Apr 07, 2008 11:41 AM EDT
Lowering the legal age for consumption to an age level presumably not ready to exercise such responsibility is tatamount to acknowledging and accepting alcohol abuse by established authority. Regardless of whether such behavior is common place and/ or on the increase, approval is little more than appeasement. Approval per se solves nothing. Proactive education for deterrence is perhaps the best approach, but incredibly difficult to achieve. We know that other nations have addressed this issue-- perhaps a study of their efforts might prove useful before taking action. Otherwise, limited exceptions may be appropriate, e.g., the military.

Posted by Colleen Williams, RN, MS on Apr 07, 2008 11:35 AM EDT
The drinking age is 21 because our youg people's brains and livers are still under development. Because of this, young people are more at risk for the development of addiction. This is why the smoking age should be 21 as well. If they stop doing things that are damaging their bodies while still under 21, they have an incredible opportunity to heal their bodies from past choices. Our military are under incredible stress. In my opinion it would be better to help them deal with it in a manner that won't bring more harm to their mind, body, and spirit. I am disgusted!

Posted by Frank Winkler on Apr 07, 2008 11:28 AM EDT
There are many good points made here, both pro and con. Its difficult at best to justify a prohibition of lower drinking age to active duty military, especially those over seas where it is permitted. The military has appropriate measures and procedures in place to address abuse of alcohol by anyone, regardless of age. To suggest that it should be used as a "dumping ground" for abusers as an alternative to jail is at best simplistic and uninformed. In fact, such attempts in the past to use the military to "fix" people with a variety of problems (lack of education, drug and alcohol abuse, criminal past, etc.) have failed miserably. Consider: would you really want someone with an alcohol problem to guard nuclear weapons armed with a machine gun? Would you want that same individual backing up your son or brotherin a combat situation? Or flying a plane? I speak with 25 years experience in the security career field and can assure you I saw the miserable results of such social experiments. In sum, they don't work, and they constitute a huge waste of precious resources as a rsult. I will comment separately on the merits and problems of lowering the legal age for sonsumption.

Posted by Melissa Hallmark on Apr 07, 2008 11:17 AM EDT
Maturity has nothing to due with the fact drinking is and always will be damaging to individuals that do so. A person who is 18 is still a child in many ways and may or may not have the the ablility to make decisions that are for the greater good for themselves or for this country. Lowering the legal age for Alcohol would only increase the number of persons we see each year going into rehab for alcohol abuse.

Posted by Dee on Apr 07, 2008 11:05 AM EDT
I refer this discussion to the JTO article "Researchers Find Lingering Memory Problems Related to Binge Drinking". Until society starts to fully ban binge drinking until drunk, our children's fragile brains are at risk. Keep the discussion fully on the topic of alcohol without bringing in the military issue (which is important but confuses this issue.) I work with 18 to 21 year olds who are still so immature and fragile. Their concept of drinking is to drink until drunk or until the alcohol is all drunk up, whichever comes first. The responsible drinking that many people choose is the 1 or 2 drinks with a meal. The discussion should focus upon how to present this difference to our children so that we can limit brain damage.

Posted by Michele on Apr 07, 2008 10:39 AM EDT
Lowering would only increase more underage drinking accidents causeing deaths. I know all too well as I know of said case in NH back in the early 1980's. This person is still traumatized years later. Please do not lower the age for anyone if anything increase to at least 25.

Posted by JoisyAdMan on Apr 07, 2008 10:28 AM EDT
I did not realize that volunteering for the military is an indication of maturity. I guess if you are younger than 18 and "volunteer" to join a gang you are showing real maturity and therefore we should lower the drinking age to 16, or maybe even 15. Do I hear 14? I agree with Dr. Rostenberg and others who point to prevention and parental education as the way to bring at least a slow-down to underage drinking.

Posted by Amy on Apr 07, 2008 10:04 AM EDT
I am opposed to lowering the drinking age. I do believe if you want to consume alcohol you will consume it but I am not an advocate for making it a legal action. Young people don't understand the ramifications of alcohol consumption all they see is it makes for a good time. Not only will it be an issue with DUI/ traffic crashes it will also lead to more STD's and quite possibly an increase in unwanted pregnancy with hopefully not alcohol or drug addicted babies. Why do something that could have such an adverse impact on our young people when what we are currently doing is working.

Posted by Kiki on Apr 07, 2008 10:01 AM EDT
I like the idea of raising the age requirement for joining the armed forces, but I fear that would mean that society would have to absorb the responsibility for controlling the troubled population. I'm afraid that we have nothing in place nearly as effective for turning wayward boys and girls into disciplined young men and women as the military. Too, studies show that societies without prohibitions on alcohol have less problematic drinking than societies who treat the substance as a rite of initiation into adulthood by imposing age limits on its consumption. I'm a Fundamentalist Christian, but I'd be supportive of the de-criminalization of the consumption and possession of ALL substances - reserving prison space for only those involved in the distribution and manufacture of substances that do not meet the standards for government control on its quality or do not submit to taxation. My guess is that the population, by and large, would view all government-approved and taxed substances as the Establishment's attempt to keep them hooked and then I bet you'd see some folks sober up for life!

Posted by Tracy K on Apr 07, 2008 10:00 AM EDT
Perhaps there wouldn't be much difference to lowering the drinking age because people of any age will find a way to drink or do drugs if they really want to.Most younger people today aren't drinking as much because they're using prescription drugs or Meth.

Posted by Johnnie Parrish on Apr 07, 2008 09:59 AM EDT
WOW! Can you imagine some lane brain legislators wanting MORE drunks on the road. We have too many asit is. As far as some 18 year 'children' being in the military; IF you will investigate the situation, you will find there are a large number of these young people were given the "CHOICE" by a court judge: JAIL vs MILITARY. This is the gospel truth.

Posted by Warren Schlesinger on Apr 07, 2008 09:54 AM EDT
Congress should change the law to allow exemptions for several states to experiment with a lowered drinking age perhaps for a five year period to gather data. The culture is different today. Drinking and driving is much less culturally acceptable and the penalties for doing both are higher and could be raised even more so for under 21 drivers. The arguments in favor of lowering the drinking age are all winning arguments if it does not result in a substantial increase in DUI accidents for 18-21 year olds.

Posted by Lisa on Apr 07, 2008 09:42 AM EDT
Even though it is believed that a person should be mature by age 21, the fact still remains that alcohol changes everything and common sense goes out the window. There are people that just shouldn't dring, no matter how old they are. Now, mix that with an immature 18 year old and the results are even worse. Lowering the drinking age leads to many ill effects besides just raising the number of DUI's and fatal car crashes. The domino effect is inevitable and as an inhabitant of Wisconsin, I really don't want to have to witness the aftermath of a lower drinking age. I can't even believe that this is being considered!!

Posted by Allen on Apr 07, 2008 09:25 AM EDT
ok--wow--"21" works. proven. eighteen..teen..teenager..on the way to becoming adult men and women..currently young men and women..indeed, 18 is way too young for all the virtues of adulthood.

Posted by katherine van wormer on Apr 07, 2008 09:21 AM EDT
We need to lower the drinking age to 16 and encourage parents and other adults to model moderate drinking. We basically have Prohibition for young adults and the binge drinking and unchaperoned parties are out of hand. Professor of Social Work University of Northern Iowa

Posted by Lauren on Apr 07, 2008 09:21 AM EDT
Changing the drinking age to 18 would allow colleges and universities struggling with alcohol use to deal with the problem as a public health issue rather than a legal issue.

Posted by forder on Apr 07, 2008 08:57 AM EDT
Yes, and the fact that the brain does not fully develop until early to mid twenties is indeed another indicator why we should not expose our youth to the trauma and horrors of battle at 18.

Posted by Marta Szuba on Apr 07, 2008 08:57 AM EDT
I am just amazed that any state would consider lowering the drinking age. Someone has forgotten that when they raised the drinking age to 21 they did so becasue of statistics that reflected a rise in DUI/DWI and fatal car accidents among 18 to 21 year olds. There was a reduction of those statistics once the drinking age was raised. As to 18 year olds to 21 year old being women and men, they are still not suppose to be entering into contracts until 21, and are not recognized as adults until 21. Rather than lower the drinking age, lets raise the age that a young person can enter into the military. Lastly, I think our first responsibility is to our young people not to businesses. We know that there is new information on how alcohol effects the brain. The brain is still developing until the age of 25, and using alcolhol while the brain is developing has a driect negitive effect on the brain's potential. In the light of that knowledge lowering the drinking age to 18 is counter intuitive. We have a responsibility to protect our young people, lowering the drinking age does not do that.

Posted by John Searles on Apr 07, 2008 08:56 AM EDT
Vermont has NOT introduced legislation to lower the drinking age. The legislation is to form a commission to study lowering the drinking age.

Posted by Jessica Dewey, LADC on Apr 07, 2008 08:55 AM EDT
This doesn't make sense. I thought all the states finally got aligned on this issue and now they are backpedaling. With the budget crunch Minnesota finds itself in, I didn't realize they could be so blase` about highway funding.